The Curse of the Follow-up

“A sequel is an admission that you’ve been reduced to imitating yourself” – Don Marquis

You do one write-up….that’s well received, so they ask for another one….but how do you avoid falling into the repetition trap?

I first wrote about parkrun in this blog a few weeks ago, so when called upon to do so again, I needed to find a new angle…and for once, inspiration came close at hand on the occasion of my 250th run.

Abingdon parkrun 189, 28th March 2015

“Torture numbers and they’ll confess to anything” – Greg Easterbrook

I confess….I have become a temporary numerologist. That is, I have developed a fixation with figures leading up to my 250th parkrun. However, now that milestone has been crossed off, I can set aside those tendencies…but before I do, I just need to get a few things off my chest first:

This week’s parkrun in numbers
6.8 average runs per runner at Abingdon
18:09: male first finisher (Ciaran Birch)
21:23: female first finisher (Sarah Dudgeon)
27:26 average run time
87: March 28th is the 87th day of the year
189 Abingdon parkruns to date
244 runners today
250 runs for me!
284: the record number of runners at Abingdon

Torturing the numbers : interesting or obscure observations

i) 6 is the new 7: although the Abingdon average ‘ABAV’ is 6.8 runs per runner, you either have to be in the 6 camp or the 7 camp….or have pulled out on your 7th run by the bridge, having completed 0.8 of the circuit.

However, the ‘6 runs’ camp is far more popular (17 runners) than the ‘7 runs’ camp (7 runner), so we’ll take that as our ABAV base.

ii) Darren Topp is ABAV: with a PB time today of 27:31 on his 6th run (congratulations!), Darren is therefore the closest fit to Abingdon average.

iii) Darren is also the Median: finishing in 122nd position out of 244 runners makes Darren doubly-average as he also represents the median….wow, what are the chances of that eh?!
I didn’t even have to torture the numbers all that much in the process…maybe there is something to this numerology lark after all?

iv) There were no straights today: i.e. sequences of 5 runners finishing a second apart…as opposed to a course with no bends.

We had 5 groups where there were 4 runners in sequence (26:35-38/ 27:12-15 / 31:00-31:04 /32:09-12 /34:40-44) but somebody always had to go and mess the sequence up didn’t they, running 1 second too quick or too slow. I mean, is it tooooooo much to ask, is it?

v) There were 10 doubles: i.e. runners finishing on the same time…as opposed to generous measures of G&T.

For those who wish to check, I counted doubles on 20:24 / 24:33/ 25:54/ 28:08/ 28:34/ 31:10/ 31:38/ 32:06/ 41:26/ 41:46. There may have been more…but by now, I was getting bored with numbers.

vi) Timers beware around 26:30: no room for mistakes here, with 14 runners crossing the line in 20 seconds between 26:28 and 26:47, so it’s not just the legs that are pumping on Abingdon parkrun!

There now, I’m definitely done with numbers and can return to my preferred medium of words. But before I do, let me finish off this report with a quote, thereby rendering it symmetrical and hopefully giving pause to reflect on one of the (many) things which espouses parkrun.

“Never worry about numbers. Help one person at a time and always start with the person closest to you” – Mother Theresa

0 replies

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.